Get the skinny on new designs!
Forgot your password?
Not a member yet? Join us!
Score More Designs
Yay! You scored all of the submissions!!!
Grab the link
Embed Scoring Widget
I know those two, but the stones, who are they?
like any caricature you are not producing a realistic likeness but exaggerate prominent features i.e. Mick's lips, Keith's craggy face and glasses, Ron's spiky hair, and charlie watt's grin.
If it helps, I used this photo as a reference.
yeah cock-rock is great blah blah...
actually, no it isn't the Stones Suck
ART ROCK > COCK ROCK
maybe if you rearranged the figures so they assume the position of the heads on the actual Rushmore?
lose the text. no pun on "stones" ??
It's not a pun. Ya'll do know what a pun is - right?
hmm nice idea, could have been renderd alot better
I think the main problem with the caricatures is that they basically don't have chins, which gives Jagger in particular a horrifyingly Leno-esque appearance. For guys that skinny even in old age, the no-neck thing really throws it off.
thanks everyone - I appreciate the comments. It certianly presented a challenge to try and create carcicatures within an already defined shape.
Since detailing it more seemed to lose its rock shape I chose to go with the simple lines and all in gray scale.
FYIMy actual refrences were the stones and EASTER ISLAND not Rushmore.
sigh - I'm not a real fan of the stones either. I thought of this while looking at some photos of Easter Island and I thought the only stones as old and decrepit were the Rolling Stones.
It's not suppopsed to be a portrait. Like Easter Island the figures are more an archetype than a potrait.
Nor is it a pun.
Subtley doesn't really work on here - does it?