why is her right breast defying gravity?

no comment

I really like this as an illustration but I think I need to see all of the design that will go on the shirt to judge.

The shape of the square on the shirt is nothing like the illustration here?

Really love the colouring.

oops! sorry about that. Check my profile for the full picture.Thanks.

I really like the leaves, but the anatomy is confusing. Her left arm is elongated, her right upper arm is... boneless?, and either there's a leaf in front of her leg or it isn't attached to her body. The rain effect is great; the woman needs revisions.

Trust me,the body is right,it seems elongated but it is the actual position it is in.Legs are attatched,-look better-.I could have sent a picture but that's what drawings are about.Interpretation.Thanks anyways.

no nip?

'love the depth of her pose and expression and the rain effect on the leaves and body. i agree that the legs seem a bit off with the torso with this framing, a bit less when you see the whole picture though... nice work!

i'd buy 5

is she wearing shoes? like ballet flat shoes?
i think what is confusing about the pose is the different angles. her head and legs are going one way and it seems like her body is facing elsewhere.
but the breast definitely needs revision.

legendary...her body isn't right. it IS elongated.

is eve wearing shoes??? adam and eve were supposed to be nekked... until they ate the forbidden fruit... is this pre fruiting or post fruiting???

I had to see it and see it and see it. You're going to be seen a lot if you wear this shirt. I believe it was ElGreco who painted elongated figures with surreal longish features. Was Eve a poster girl? Great, for daring!!

if she's wearing shoes and it's, as BlackBeast said, "post-fruiting," then should eve maybe wear fig leaves over her anatomically questionable breast?
also--i didn't notice this earlier--why does her right arm have two elbows?

I'm not trying to be snippy here either, but when someone says "trust me the body is right" and then it totally isn't, I have to say something. The anatomy is off and by quite a bit. It needs to be pushed to either be more accurate or more stylized, but right now it is just in limbo land. You may have traced it exactly from a photo but that doesn't make it right. Photographic perspective is a bit different.

face is very 2D.

Rework the left eye.

it has a lot of good elements. Her manly biceps threw me off

Am I missing a link to the full image or something? People are commenting on the body but I can barely see it cause it's all cut off....
It has the potential to be a great design....but I can't see it all.

Sorry, the anatomy isn't stylized, it's just badly rendered. Her breasts are too stationary, the legs are off, and her neck is tweaked in a way that makes it look broken. Cool concept, not quite there with the execution.

3.

I see how the body is, it does make sense and it is right but you have to look at it for a while and where would you get the shoes? I really like it but it's sort of blasphemous, the whole Adam and Eve thing if you change the title maybe it would be a beautiful shirt. 4$

i can't help it, Mary, when i look at her feet i see no toes, only shoes.

To me it seems more like a fashion illustration. It is elongated indeed but he figure is very elegant and the eyes are also very expressive,I see she is really angry at Adam.
Elbows make two angles in that position and you can find young women with breasts like that.
I like it so very much***5

Is this the original Eve under a banana tree? Did she have muscles like a man? was she wearing sandals or shoes? Is the design blasphemous? Is her breast drooping? Does she have two elbows? Do you cry posing or as it comes? Gee, who said it was Eve in the first place? maybe she's just a regular Susan. I don'tknow if I like it, maybe it's too complicated for a simple t-shirt

Fix the arm on the right, and the boob, and it's a definite 5.

Her left eye is bugging me - her eyes are off-kilter, making the left one too high. (Um, left to her... right to us. The one on the right side.) If her eyes are on the line you want the face to be on, the rest of the face has to shift to catch up. Otherwise, the eyes need to be straightened out to match the face.

Also, there appears to be something seriously and painfully wrong with her right upper arm (the one crossing in front of her body).

I still like the idea despite what everyone has pointed out.

the drawing needs some work. Her right arm looks bulgy like sausages, but her left arm looks normal. (In fact, the more I look at it, its just about anatomically impossible - like she has an extra joint in her upper arm.) She has no nipple, which seems inconsistant with the high detail in the leaves and in her hair (that is hair yeah? hard to tell.) If you're trying to get out of showing the nipple you should cover it with her arm instead. Her eyes are very strange, and I'm not sure what that expression is meant to convey. Oh also her left elbow looks wrong. Do you know anyone with a square elbow?
Well I do think this concept is kind of intriguing. I am curious to see what you do in the future.

legs? oh I didnt' even see them till I read other comments! They do seem twisted in an uncomfortable angle from her torso, at best. Maybe you should practice drawing friends or models in different positions.

i really do like the concept, and i love irregular/abstract anatomy, but it just doesn't work with this one. either all of it has to look weird or none of it.

but i still like it <3

neat concept, poor anatomy...

I the style of the leaves, but its hard to determine the figure, even looking at the full version of it. As stated above, the anatomy is poor.

TipsyGiant, at 10:09am on Jun 7, 2006
why is her right breast defying gravity?


Clearly because Eve was the perfect woman. Why can't the rest of them do that? ;)

intersting idea....

the leaves are really pretty
her body is kind of... torqued. needs a little work. but it's really nice.

i didn´t like the left arm!
=D
thought its great.. $5

I have serious problems with the anatomy, in ... several places. But I like other things about it. It could be reworked, but you should probably use a reference picture. YES there's interpretation and in some cases exaggeration, but the rules of anatomy can only be stretched so far. and it takes a lot of skill to do it right.

I am horribly confused by this. At first, I thought it was a man. And I don't see breasts or toes or what other commenters have mentioned, only a strangely bent, triple-jointed left arm and overly muscular right arm and an awkwardly angled neck. (Where are the body parts I don't see? I'm such a noob.)

does anybody remember the movie fern gully...?