Scoring finished:
1006 days ago
Submitted on:
Jan 05 '06
Scored by:
2,448 people
Comments:
72 comments
Final average score:
2.54 out of 5
|
This is my first submission. Let me know what you think. I think the site is great and I look forward to participating.
|
|
Thanks for the comments. I wasn't sure if anyone would get it without the text. I prefer it without the text also. Is there a way to update the submission?
|
|
As much as I hate how trendy it is on this site to say "lose the text," I have to agree that this illustration stands on its own. "lose the text" and it's a 5$. Right now it's a 4.
|
|
Ive seen this before a couple times, but this is the best i have seen it illustrated, but yeh, theres no need for text
|
|
saying no text would be redundant at this point. Great illustration, I think it is sweet...lets all not forget that they did print afternoon delight...
|
|
I think this means fatty you need to lose the text great idea and artwork look foward to more
psssst i like your choice of colours too!!! |
|
" dmenkes, at 1:29pm on Jan 5, 2006
Uhm...kinda incestuous, don't you think? " Only if that egg was laid by that particular chicken. |
|
I saw this but a few days ago in a Spencers.
Exact same, except the illustration. The spencers version had a pictorial of an egg sodomizing a chicken. |
|
Thanks for the comments everyone. I have never seen artwork for this before, but I always hear jokes about it. I was sure it had been done somewhere before, just thought I'd put my own spin on it.
|
|
fix the alignment on the lettering. i feel it should also be in perspective. right now. im getting a woozle wazzle in my innards. fix. 5
|
|
played. so fucking played. this has been done on a shirt. perhaps not at threadless, but it has been done. knock it off. it is weak.
|
|
Lose the text, love the concept and illustration, I think the design would stand out more on a lighter or cooler color shirt instead of the warmer red.
|
|
oh my gosh.. i've seen this concept everywhere...
even Spencers........ i dont shop at Spencers.. but still.. Spencers. this gets a 1 for the illustration... |
|
I'm not sure if anyone has pointed this out, but the text is secretly dirty. Which is why I originally thought the text was included to begin with. It appears that may not have been the case.
|
|
yeah yeah yeah, lose the text, or change it to who came first.
and the answer is clearly NOT the egg. poor egg. |
|
it makes me laugh, but i bought my friend a shirt from spencers that was basically the same thing, only it said "who came first" and had the chicken actually doing the egg.
|
|
Good concept. Too Bad I already saw a shirt with a similar concept at Spencer's Gifts at my local mall. Try again...preferrably without the plagarism.
|
|
Haha, wow, it took me a minute to get what the shirt was saying.
But then I got it. And I laughed. :) I don't know if I could wear something that dirty! |
528 days later
|
I think it would look better without the text, but I don't think I would have understood without it, but then again I've never heard the joke before.
|
109 days later
|
i totally would not get it without the text. u had a reason 4 putting it there--so keep it! better to overkill the idea a tiny bit than everybody going "now what the heck do u mean by this?"
|
|
I hate this design. It's one of my worst ones. Please only look at "sink yourself" and on when browsing my designs :)
|
203 days later
154 days later
You must be logged in to leave a comment.
© 2008, a skinnyCorp LLC company.
All designs Copyright by owner.
Privacy Policy.
Terms of Use.
Weekly new tees
In stock
News
Submissions




