version 2...

pretty cool....but why did u choose a green house instead of a regular house?

I'm assuming it's supposed to be "People in glass houses..." but it does look more like a greenhouse. Maybe if you could see that there were people inside instead of plants, it would come across better. Unless of course I have it all wrong.

The fact that it's a GLASShouse means that it should be transparent, i.e. you should be able to see the crossbeams and outlines of the other two sides of it. It doesn't really work at the moment, in my opinion, because it isn't transparent enough, so it just simply doesn't look like it's made out of glass.

lame

extreamly clever. i think the design is artist choice, i mean the image conveys a crystal clear message its obviously a stone thrown in a glass house, if it were to detailed it would lose its appeal change the background color to something less blue. 5+$

unless there is hydro growing in there i hate it.

not very strong design sorry..........i didnt get meaning of this untill i read other replies

Dont make it transparent. I agree with moses smith. Transparency would also make it very cluttered. Its clever and I got it right away but the stone is a bit small. Making some shine streaks across the pannels might make it more 'glass' looking. Other than that, good job! :)

why not try a Philip Johnson-esque glass house?
or the Fawnsworth House (Mies Van Der Rohe)
or a skyscraper?
I think it would be more interesting (and historically and design accurate)

it could be frosted glass... It's not "people in clear glass houses.." If you couldn't get this right away, you have issues, not the design. I think it's brilliant.