 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 
Most politicians seem like dickheads to me...
|
|
The illustration is fantastic, but I didn't get that they were politicians. Thiose chairs made me think of film directors.
|
|
:)) like it completely.. 5
|
|
100% nice. it gets a 5+buy. i think that's the first time i've given a 5+buy in at least a year.
|
 |
4
|
 |
great illustration. not so great other stuff.
|
|
I agree, the ilustration rocks, just drop the text
|
 |
cintrao on Jan 17 '05 don't drop a thing . Love it.
|
|
i love ittttttttttttttttttttttttttttt. love love love it. 5 and buy.
|
|
proletarian on Jan 17 '05 drop the text and i would buy this in a second
|
|
i think you're giving away too much with the text around. it says so much already even without it. and it doesn't have to be about politicians.
|
 |
akaFab on Jan 17 '05 Normally, I dont like text on T's... but I think it works well on this T... either way, LOVE IT!!! :)
|
|
i like it! the paint splatter in the background is cool n the illustration is dope.. but i agree that the chairs make them look like film directors though.. they should be sitting on a more vintage n classic chair..
|
 |
stotty01 on Jan 18 '05 This is great, a well executed idea. 5
|
|
like the illustration..maybe just comic text ballons with no text? insinuates speaking but not so overt?
|
|
I'd lose the text.
|
|
Sixten on Jan 18 '05 Cheers for the comments... the original illustration is actually of two politicians, that's why I wrote the comment... doesn't matter though, they could be anyone I guess... in reality though they were sitting talking to each other.
I don't want to drop the text, I know some might find it offencive but that's part of what makes it funny... it's meant to be obvious. |
 |
At first glance I thought it was a man and women fighting until I saw that they were both men. Awesome drawing. Text is funny.
|
 |
At first, word association came to mind.
...say the first word that comes to your mind... but, I guess I was wrong.. |
|
far from a poultry effort... sorry
|
|
double meanings are pretty lame.
|
 |
theyre both cocks though....arent they?
i thought only roosters has the dangly head bits. i mean, rooster=male CHICKEN, so 'chicken' is appropriate, but why would one say 'cock' to to other is he's a cock too? i dont know. its things like these that i think too much about and then they start to bother me and yeah....i like the illustration though, just not digging the text. |
|
Skip the speech-text stuff. Just having the two chickens in chairs and suits arguing is awesome.
|
|
yeah totally love the fact that chickens heads are on bodies sitting in chairs. that is just fuckingawesome <333
lose the text maybe? otherwise LOVE +5buy |
 |
sort of "Love Without Anger" meets "Recipe for Hate"...great design - 5$
|
|
brilliant
|
|
Don't like the monochromatic color, I'd rather see complementary colors and definitely lose the type, the good illustration is all you need. Otherwise, definitely a 5!
|
|
Haha tha'ts awesome, definitely a 5 and a buy
|
|
hahahaha chicken cock...that's great!
|
|
awsome, 5 and buy
|
 |
Beautiful Illustration > Text
It doesn't need unnecessary words, really. Methinks text should come in only if there's a message or it's funny. Chicken/Cock = Ehhh.. Some may find it funny. Verryy nice illustration, though. |
© 2009, a skinnyCorp LLC company. All designs copyright by owner.
