EXTRA NICE 5 worth it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

it's decent, nice use of "text shadowing" however I don't think it's too original. i've seen plenty of t-shirts that use text to fill out an object. but, originality isn't everything. i'll 3 it

smells like nirvana?

if you havent... you should all check out "LUST DESIGN"

ummm dont know the url but you can find it real easy through a search engine

Appropriating the baby from Nirvana's Nevermind was pretty brazen of you.

that looks like part of the our lady peace website. i've seen it before. still cool though.

yeah.... and thoes tiny numbers and symbols won't print very well through a screen

wow... just found out that ascii is a non printable code...

http://www.asciitable.com/

am i on camera right now... there's a plane white van outside my house... and i hear ringing all the time... this is like a bad movie :D

fucking sweet. 5.

Good composition with nirvana baby. But isn´t so original --> http://www.barcodeart.com/art/portrait/portrait.html

What program you use to do it?

mm nirvana..



i like the bart simpson one better ;)

this is my secret : http://www.lelogicielgratuit.com/index.php?module=telecharger&fileid=184

sorry but it's french...

Very nice!

ok so may be nirvana cover but I still love it and the colours are great too, definite 5

i love ascii artwork. I want it even if the baby image isn't the most original. it would be a really cool shirt.

don't rip off someone else's work..it's a cheap-ass move and ....oh......did i mention this sucks?

nirvana...orgasm

very pretty, but i wouldnt wear it

its the nirvana baby!

1) its someone else's already-popular art.

--------photographers are artists, too. and its a freaking ALBUM COVER. everyone knows it. ITS NOT YOURS.



2) you didnt do that ascii work, a program did it for you. you can tell when people do things ORIGINAL, and this is NOT.





= NOT YOURS. NOT ORIGINAL. WONT GET PRINTED. 0.

god i love it.

5

nirvana is so overrated it hurts... um nice shirt though

ok vwoop, but for this product http://www.threadless.com/product/113.html#zoom ?

who draw the queen card ? who take the picture of the statue ? and the face ? and the legs ? and ... and ...

do you know the andy warhol's mona lisa ? http://www.acsu.buffalo.edu/~mertz/casemona.html

i am not Andy Warhol but art have no rules !

sometimes I get the urge to be nasty...but then I just pause...and take a deep breath...and sometimes it goes away....like right now....

nicouze



http://www.threadless.com/product/113.htm

this artist took the things, made them different from what they already were, and placed them next to other things that normally wouldnt be there. it is a composition that took thought, effort, and actually *has* design in it. its not *completely* original (as in, they didnt create each element from their head, yes they had many references) -- but the final product is so different and amazing, that *the final product* is something that people *most likely* would not have been able to picture themselves.



this kid, here, this little joker, stole the album cover image (that has a copyright), put it in an ASCII program, and let someone else do the work. (the artist/designer/techinician ---WITH BRAINS -- that made the program, had to be original and had to put forth effort.) it took *this kid* no more than 2 minutes to steal something, plug it in, and submit it as *ooh-la-la,-its-now-my-piece-of-work....-yeah-right*.... theres no composition, theres no design, theres no juxtiposition with other elements -- basically, there is no effort or work or originality in it.



im not impressed or amazed by unoriginal things, thats all.

aw kurt

ahaha !! you're really funny julia ! make a submission please... i really want to know what you can do with your brain !!

:-))

but maybe it's you who program "adobe illustrator" !!





http://art.mon.amour.free.fr

A for effort.

0 for..not being original.

ok ok. i understand !

my next submissions will be with another baby...

a baby that nobody knows ! mine !

Well, i feel like most people here, using a copyrighted, superfamous picture that just about everyone above the age of 14 recognizes is pretty.. dumb.



BUT instead of using someones bitmap->ASCII tool this little baby could've been built up by famous Nirvana lyrics or something. Then it'd have a meaning. I guess.

there is a copyright on Nirvana lyrics too !!

who cares if he stole it, it's fugly

fucking hell girls... who cares?

thanx all for comments ! you are very cool ! 8)