Bowled over by sexy legs

i'm just not a big fan of t-shirts that use women as sex objects.

I think it's hot! $5

no. probably because i'm a girl.

high heels don't make good bowling shoes.

Women are sex objects... so are men.



Why do people deny... legs = sexy



You can deny it till you are blue in the face, you can not like it forever, but its still true and will be till the end of the human race. (ooh that rhymes) ... lol



But seriously, to all you women who dont like women being treated as sex objects... I say this. If you dont want to be a sex object, stop being one. A simple bullet to the head should suffice. Or you could burn yourself from head to toe, then no one will think of you sexually ever again.



But seriously... how can anyone deny, the human body IS a sex object, both male and female. Sex is part of every human... You cant take it away without also taking yourself out of the picture.



...Try getting over it, maybe then you will feel better about men liking sexy legs.

Please show me a submission on threadless that portrays men as sex objects.

Here is a new one. Nice sexy male image.



http://www.threadless.com/submission/121359/marriage



Lets see if i can find more.

It reminds me of the dream sequence in The Big Lebowski

Tacky... especially the panties showing.

I would buy if there was more of a concept to it rather than "yay legs!"

men portray themselves as sex objects, just look at music videos of guys showing off their pumped up bodies (i think it's funny though, they're such peacocks).

meh.

In this one... the chicken is the sex object... =)

http://www.threadless.com/product/456/Rock_Out_With_Your_Cock_Out



I will say, having looked around a big, there is a lack of Male sex objects on threadless. Its kinda sad, being male, i feel for the ladies. Why arent you artists making some eye candy for the women already. BEEFCAKE! ... Im sure they will appreciate it.



And maybe then, they wont be so sour over the nice female art.

legs don't bother me, but I think the panty flash is unecessary. Sexier without.

Well, you wouldn't see her panties if she had worn an appropriate length skirt!!



Signed,

Your Mother

I'd like to see more shirts with good looking ladies on them. This one is pretty cool, but I'm not digging how her arms get cut off. It kind of works for the skirt, but I guess I'd rather see the whole body. I mean, there are lots of questions to answer : Is she blonde, brunette?



Also, you're missing the back row of pins.

quality response skafiend0007!

i wouldn't wear it. i find the color choice poor and the drawing is a bit simple. otherwise, not offended. just don't see this one printing.

I mean, there are lots of questions to answer : Is she blonde, brunette?



Well, I can kinda see... yup, she's a brunette...

I'm not a fan of shirts that treat disembodied hands as sex objects; seriously, don't care for the half a person thing. Her legs and feet are angled so she looks like she's in an awkward "I have to pee" pose. And I don't like the colors, and don't see a point to the concept except to get a quick glimpse of her cartoon panties.

echo1985 said: It reminds me of the dream sequence in The Big Lebowski



That makes me want to buy it. Otherwise, this design just isn't my bag.



As for the sex object thing, I could care less; this didn't offend me at all.



I don't see how some people can be so sensitive, heh.

i don't find this offensive, lol, if she wants to look hot at the bowling alley then let her!!!



i take issue with the fact that she's a pair of legs with a disembodied hand floating next to her. and the bowling ball, which bothers me enough because it's white, seems to be floating in front of her hand instead of actually being held.

I don't particularly wish to look up a girl's skirt. If that makes me overly sensitive, then so be it.



(Also, in terms of the drawing itself, put some shading on the ball and the pins.)



In response to xardox, I have no problem looking at women as sex objects- but only if they want to be viewed that way. This is creepy to me because of the implied lack of consent of the girl. Her positioning makes it clear that she doesn't know I'm looking up her skirt. Plus, she HAS. NO. HEAD. How is that not creepy? I feel like a perv.

also, i wouldn't buy this anyway, but i like that she's standing a little awkwardly. it's a kind of "now i see why they told me to rent shoes, now what do i do" pose

well what would you prefer, panties or no panties? yup that's what i thought. nice design, man $5

I don't care about the "objectification" of the female in this shirt. I wouldn't buy it because it's simply not done well.

Hm, no.

the thing is, legs are sexy... but this girl has borderline cankles, as well as dis-proportioned thighs.

Arguments of objectification and panty flashes aside, attractive people does not a good design make. This is pretty boring, as are most designs that rely on cartoons of sexualized body parts. It's not dynamic, it's not very well composed, and the color scheme just removes any sex appeal it might have.

Lebowski reference?

hurray for women being sex objects