Chelsea Dire Show
Scoring has ended
The stats
Scoring finished:
3161 days ago
Submitted on:
Sep 30 '03
Comments:
16 comments
Average score:
1.20 from 292 votes
Share with friends
My other submissions
 |
smaller please..
|
|
yeah, the graphic too big
|
 |
But I wanted it big to create a bigger impact.
|
|
But it's beating us to death!
I like it, but I will NEVER ever wear anything that huge. |
|
OK! Do I need to resubmit to change the size of the flower?
|
|
Don't you men chelsea flower show..?????
Mmm if its that big on a shirt people won't b able 2 c what it is! yes u do |
|
The title was supposed to be ironic as I distressed an illustration of a flower that I saw at the Chelsea Flower Show!
|
 |
¥s on Oct 02 '03 didn't warhol die a long time ago?
|
|
Warhol!?! Well at least it's not pixel art!
|
|
I know you want it big for impact, but if you want it centered on the shirt, scale it down. If it was wrapping around the side to the back, then It could be usefull to keep it big. It's a good image, but don't confuse size with ability to "pop" (I hate using that term, it's such a client thing to say). Make it smaller and you'll have this real intense image jumping off a big grey space. Think of the bullseye and not the whole target.
|
|
I always hate it when the timid people out there want designs to be smaller, but guess what...?
|
|
The illustrations mad nice.
I aint got beef with the size. My suggestion is put it on a shirt that compliments the colors better. Grey is nice but a more complimentary color will make it easier on the viewer's eyes. And my question is that I see artifacts in the negative space around the flower. Is this supposed to be there or just a byproduct of the sample? |
|
The more i look at it, the more i like it.
|
|
Everything on the shirt is meant to be there - I wanted to give a sort of deconstructed effect to the flower but making it more vibrant than it was originally.
I like the size but agree with criticsims to make it either slightly smaller or wrap it (nice idea). As for background colour - how about green? Not sure I guess it's objectional don't you? |
2 days later
|
less is more...dang thats big!
|
|
what are old ladies shopping on threadless now?
|
You must be logged in to leave a comment.