<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>	<rss version="2.0">
	    <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[reoffender87's Threadless Blog]]></title>
    <description><![CDATA[Keep up to date on all things Threadless!]]></description>
    <link>http://www.threadless.com/</link>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 22:36:59 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
			<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Hoodie fail!]]></title>
						<link><![CDATA[http://www.threadless.com/profile/698615/reoffender87/567902/Hoodie_fail?utm_medium=feed&utm_source=rss&utm_campaign=blog]]></link>
			<guid><![CDATA[http://www.threadless.com/profile/698615/reoffender87/567902/Hoodie_fail?utm_medium=feed&utm_source=rss&utm_campaign=blog]]></guid>
						<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 02:55:52 -0500</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Love the design. Waiting for a reprint for ages and when I saw it available as a hoodie I thought 'this is too good to be true'. And I was right. <br />
<br />
Beautiful design wasted on poor placement and design size. Why couldn't they have a large print on the front of the zip up hoodie like they did for the <a href="http://www.threadless.com/product/810/Living_In_Harmony"> Living in Harmony </a> hoodie? WHY?]]></description>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Whhhy on the Threadless brand tee?]]></title>
						<link><![CDATA[http://www.threadless.com/profile/698615/reoffender87/505729/Whhhy_on_the_Threadless_brand_tee?utm_medium=feed&utm_source=rss&utm_campaign=blog]]></link>
			<guid><![CDATA[http://www.threadless.com/profile/698615/reoffender87/505729/Whhhy_on_the_Threadless_brand_tee?utm_medium=feed&utm_source=rss&utm_campaign=blog]]></guid>
						<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:50:28 -0500</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Love it, want it, would TOTALLY buy it but for the fact that its printed on the threadless brand tee. I can't abide it. The thinner material, thinner collar and, most importantly, the poor quality. Why oh why?]]></description>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Old menagerie looks WAY better and those damn threadless brand tees]]></title>
						<link><![CDATA[http://www.threadless.com/profile/698615/reoffender87/472525/Old_menagerie_looks_WAY_better_and_those_damn_threadless_brand_tees?utm_medium=feed&utm_source=rss&utm_campaign=blog]]></link>
			<guid><![CDATA[http://www.threadless.com/profile/698615/reoffender87/472525/Old_menagerie_looks_WAY_better_and_those_damn_threadless_brand_tees?utm_medium=feed&utm_source=rss&utm_campaign=blog]]></guid>
						<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 23:44:26 -0500</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Why did they print it on light pink and light blue shirts? I loved how the old one looked like it was in the style of an old-time-y sketch. Not a fan of the side positioning either. <br />
<br />
Why change it when the original looked so much better?<br />
<br />
Side note: Why can't they print every shirt on the American Apparel shirts? I'm not a fan of these thinner and poorer quality threadless tees. It's actually making me rethink purchasing a lot of shirts with designs I love. <br />
]]></description>
		</item>
		
	    </channel>
	</rss>
