<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>	<rss version="2.0">
	    <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[sold91's Threadless Blog]]></title>
    <description><![CDATA[Keep up to date on all things Threadless!]]></description>
    <link>http://www.threadless.com/</link>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 22:10:17 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
			<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Why Threadless is better]]></title>
						<link><![CDATA[http://www.threadless.com/profile/647290/sold91/378588/Why_Threadless_is_better?utm_medium=feed&utm_source=rss&utm_campaign=blog]]></link>
			<guid><![CDATA[http://www.threadless.com/profile/647290/sold91/378588/Why_Threadless_is_better?utm_medium=feed&utm_source=rss&utm_campaign=blog]]></guid>
						<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 22:29:07 -0500</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[So after doing a little browsing through Threadless's &quot;rival&quot; Design By Humans, I've come to the conclusion that most of what they print would be rejected designs here. <br />
They also seem to have a certain fetish for covering up every last inch of the t-shirt, which, in my opinion, just screams &quot;WHOA! LOOK AT ME!!!&quot;. I'm not saying some Threadless shirts don't do that, just not 99% of them. <br />
<br />
I also think we're cheaper.<br />
By a lot.]]></description>
		</item>
		
	    </channel>
	</rss>
