<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>	<rss version="2.0">
	    <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[StitchPirate's Threadless Blog]]></title>
    <description><![CDATA[Keep up to date on all things Threadless!]]></description>
    <link>http://www.threadless.com/</link>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 02:38:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
			<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Did I get a bad shirt?]]></title>
						<link><![CDATA[http://www.threadless.com/profile/581135/StitchPirate/377750/Did_I_get_a_bad_shirt?utm_medium=feed&utm_source=rss&utm_campaign=blog]]></link>
			<guid><![CDATA[http://www.threadless.com/profile/581135/StitchPirate/377750/Did_I_get_a_bad_shirt?utm_medium=feed&utm_source=rss&utm_campaign=blog]]></guid>
						<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 23:43:39 -0500</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[My shirt arrived today, and I'm not really happy.  There are big smudge marks on the print where it looks like it was wrinkled when it was printed.  Mostly by the neck on the back, and at the armpits.  Do all of the shirts have their own unique printing issues (due to the nature of the all over print), or did I just get a crappy shirt?  I hope that I just got a bad shirt, because I love this design and would love to have it on a shirt, but I don't want a smudgy, amateurish printing job.  <br />
<br />
Edit:  I'm aware that some inconsistencies are to be expected (especially around the seams, etc.), but I think mine looks way worse than I would have thought. I should have phrased my question, &quot;Is it normal that mine is THIS bad?&quot; <br />
Pictures of my shirt:  <br />
http://i35.tinypic.com/j090go.jpg<br />
http://i34.tinypic.com/fd8zrq.jpg<br />
http://i34.tinypic.com/208twdc.jpg<br />
http://i37.tinypic.com/10n6wl2.jpg]]></description>
		</item>
		
	    </channel>
	</rss>
