<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>	<rss version="2.0">
	    <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[mofo0063's Threadless Blog]]></title>
    <description><![CDATA[Keep up to date on all things Threadless!]]></description>
    <link>http://www.threadless.com/</link>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2012 05:34:03 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
			<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Nice shirt, but I've seen better parodies on threadless.]]></title>
						<link><![CDATA[http://www.threadless.com/profile/46146/mofo0063/61099/Nice_shirt_but_I_ve_seen_better_parodies_on_threadless?utm_medium=feed&utm_source=rss&utm_campaign=blog]]></link>
			<guid><![CDATA[http://www.threadless.com/profile/46146/mofo0063/61099/Nice_shirt_but_I_ve_seen_better_parodies_on_threadless?utm_medium=feed&utm_source=rss&utm_campaign=blog]]></guid>
						<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 18:06:27 -0500</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[I like this shirt a lot, the idea and all, but I wouldn't buy it. Does anyone remember an old submission called "ceci n'est pas un mouton"? It had a wolf in sheeps skin, possibly even smoking a pipe, and it really tickled my fancy. Just lamenting, that's all. ]]></description>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title><![CDATA[finally a reprint.... with a FAT DISGUSTIFICATION]]></title>
						<link><![CDATA[http://www.threadless.com/profile/46146/mofo0063/61096/finally_a_reprint_with_a_FAT_DISGUSTIFICATION?utm_medium=feed&utm_source=rss&utm_campaign=blog]]></link>
			<guid><![CDATA[http://www.threadless.com/profile/46146/mofo0063/61096/finally_a_reprint_with_a_FAT_DISGUSTIFICATION?utm_medium=feed&utm_source=rss&utm_campaign=blog]]></guid>
						<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 18:02:16 -0500</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[I'll start out by admitting that I  invented a word to make that title. But that's hardly the point. I love this shirt and own it in the original cream. The first reprint made me happy, but gray? It was a little iffy, and definitely not an improvement. But PALE YELLOW? Don't get me wrong, I own a yellow shirt and I like it, but on this shirt it honestly just looks wrong. What happened? Why does threadless insist on fixing what ain't broken? I've seen too many shirts I wanted ruined by nasty colors in their reprints, but this CLASSIC.... it's just a shame]]></description>
		</item>
				<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Reflection on Threadless tees... a post from a blog discussion]]></title>
						<link><![CDATA[http://www.threadless.com/profile/46146/mofo0063/55526/Reflection_on_Threadless_tees_a_post_from_a_blog_discussion?utm_medium=feed&utm_source=rss&utm_campaign=blog]]></link>
			<guid><![CDATA[http://www.threadless.com/profile/46146/mofo0063/55526/Reflection_on_Threadless_tees_a_post_from_a_blog_discussion?utm_medium=feed&utm_source=rss&utm_campaign=blog]]></guid>
						<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 20:00:45 -0500</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Eskimokiss posted a blog about "Decay" that started a big discussion about Threadless' choice of tees to print on. I wrote a long ass post so i decided to post it separately as well over here.<br />
<br />
Just my two cents on the subject of AA/FOTL<br />
<br />
IMO threadless probably got a lot of complaints about American Apparel because of the bizarre fit and unpredictable shrinkage. I got an AA in small from a different site and it was skin tight, I went up a size and it still makes me look like i have fat tits (i'm a skinny but barrel chested guy). Also AA shirts are also super long and too close in the armpits, they seem designed for some mens' equivalent of kate moss. They do look very good on some guys though, and the cotton is super nice.<br />
<br />
Fruit of the Loom on the other hand is closer to the actual given sizing (medium is actually medium, etc.) even though they are too long and a little rough. I think FOTL was just a compromise. I do think Threadless should look into different suppliers though because the awkward fit of FOTL prevents me from buying more shirts. I liked the supplier they had before, when the shirts still had tags and when "Follow_It" had just come out, I still have that shirt from 2.5 years ago and it's holding up great.]]></description>
		</item>
		
	    </channel>
	</rss>
