<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>	<rss version="2.0">
	    <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[veganrabbit's Threadless Blog]]></title>
    <description><![CDATA[Keep up to date on all things Threadless!]]></description>
    <link>http://www.threadless.com/</link>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 16:41:46 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
			<item>
			<title><![CDATA[My first Threadless-brand shirt. Ugh.]]></title>
						<link><![CDATA[http://www.threadless.com/profile/281660/veganrabbit/329359/My_first_Threadless_brand_shirt_Ugh]]></link>
						<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 12:06:26 -0500</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[I haven't ordered since the new Threadless tees started being produced, so I'm a bit behind on this one. I just got my package of 7 new shirts, and one was on the new Threadless-branded &quot;girly&quot; tee. Here's a question: Why the hell is it so long? Unless Threadless is following the vagaries of fickle fashion (in this case, tunic-style tees) or has started producing night shirts, I have no idea why a t-shirt must reach one's crotch. And no, I don't have an abnormally stunted torso, and I'm of exactly average height.<br />
<br />
At least I have a stockpile of Threadless AA shirts now. This makes me sad...I may never order another Threadless shirt again. I knew I was returning the shirt the moment I slipped it over my head. And as it's much more fitted at the top (which I'm okay with) I can't shrink it to alter the length. So yes, it's going back. <br />
<br />
One more thing: please stop calling them &quot;girly&quot; tees. It's really patronizing. Even &quot;girl's &quot;would be a better alternative, considering it's sort of the opposite of &quot;guy's&quot;. I can only assume calling the sizing &quot;men's&quot; and &quot;women's&quot; just isn't hip enough? I may not expect better from AA, but I do from threadless.]]></description>
		</item>
		
	    </channel>
	</rss>