<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>	<rss version="2.0">
	    <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[eyechild's Threadless Blog]]></title>
    <description><![CDATA[Keep up to date on all things Threadless!]]></description>
    <link>http://www.threadless.com/</link>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 15:55:29 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
			<item>
			<title><![CDATA[What font to use...]]></title>
						<link><![CDATA[http://www.threadless.com/profile/162287/eyechild/9983/What_font_to_use?utm_medium=feed&utm_source=rss&utm_campaign=blog]]></link>
			<guid><![CDATA[http://www.threadless.com/profile/162287/eyechild/9983/What_font_to_use?utm_medium=feed&utm_source=rss&utm_campaign=blog]]></guid>
						<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2005 14:44:30 -0500</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[They say beauty is in the eye of the beholder, and it's  true.  Aesthetic judgements are both very subjective yet incredibly closely held; moreover opinions are like areholes - everyone's got one.<br />
<br />
Fonts don't necessarily have to be refined and overtly legible to perform a function, or everything would get set in Baskerville 12 point and up.  What's important is using the right font for the job.<br />
As far as what a font actually stands for, well.. meaning accretes. Think of how hip hop culture makes massive use of those grotesque Fraktur typefaces with scant regard for their ancient germanic origins.<br />
<br />
Returning to my original point again, there are a multitude of  reasons for liking something, usually to do with its inherent nature.  I remember reading an article in Eye magazine proclaiming its author's  sly liking for Cooper Black - this in spite - indeed because of it's 70s squidgy ugliness. (I love it myself by the way)<br />
<br />
So as Alec Guiness once said in a film "You must do what you feel is right, of course.."<br />
<br />
But the best font ever is Futura. And Comic Sans is still pretty wack.]]></description>
		</item>
		
	    </channel>
	</rss>
