http://www.threadless.com/ Sat, 28 Nov 2009 16:13:16 -0600 Thu, 23 Jun 2005 03:05:49 -0500
Allowing these only sends a message to children that its okay to think this AND to submit more of same.

NOT.

DaddyDom puts up White Supremist crayons, and Myke_MLA puts up a NoHomo shirt. Moo Goo Gai Pan is NOT even remotely funny.

What's with this garbage Threadless?]]> Tue, 21 Jun 2005 00:26:05 -0500
I'd love some comments on this so I can understand the rating it got better. thx
]]> Fri, 17 Jun 2005 10:53:00 -0500
pls take note of the appropriate spelling]]> Sun, 12 Jun 2005 23:09:12 -0500
At what point do i see the kind of scores I'm getting on a design submission? after 100? after its 'disqualified' or qualified?

Why doesn't Threadless include a reprint # on shirts they reprint (or do they???)

If a shirt is reprinted, does the designer get a fresh cut on the new sales?

among the other questions I've had. Can anyone answer these?

thx


]]> Sun, 12 Jun 2005 21:45:16 -0500
Not many make the cut, and I have to say that even most of the worst ass-like designs I've seen here are still way better than most of the crap that gets produced.

What i truly don't get is what motivates companies to make a shirt or jacket with their crappy logo that no one is ever going to wear off the work site. Why can't these ppl make shirts that are at least attractive and less useless. The biggest criminals here are film promo companies, beer companies, and touristy outlets.

With so many cool ideas out there, why put a text on something that totally renders it's value null?

Text isn't always bad, i used it on a shirt i hope gets approved to run, but mostly it detracts from the universal graphical message.

Anyway, I'm honest because as I prefer to hear honest thought out comments, ass or not, I'd like to see people strive to make their images meaningful as well as attractive.

]]>