I'm testing a new print prediction theory to see if it yields any meaningful results. It's entirely unbiased and is not based upon score (although many of the subs in question are high scoring). Nor is it based upon any personal preference of mine, or intuition. It's marginally scientific in the sense that the resulting list is generated completely by recording a specific anomaly, which may or may not be credible (hence the test).
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Correct predictions so far: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Page:
1 2 (77 comments!) You must be logged in to leave a comment.
|
Check me out, I got printed!My gallery photos
I haven't submitted any photos. I guess I don't want free money.
My designsAll about me |
Or are you going to keep it to yourself and use it to your own evil advantage?