here is a list of artists winning more than once in 2006. it is meant to represent the top artists of the year. note: winning designs are those that went through the threadless voting process.
the information included with each artist is listed left to right as follows: total designs (all 2006 designs) average score (average of all 2006 designs) print percentage (percent of 2006 winning designs) total wins (thumbnail images of 2006 winning designs) the list has been sorted based on total wins and total 2006 designs won (some 2006 prints were submitted in 2005), then by print percentage, and finally by average score.
example how to read: fastjumper has been printed 3 times in 2006. he has submitted 6 designs in 2006, for an average score of 2.58. of those 6 designs, 17% have been printed. most wins: JOHN2 best print percentage: JOHN2 (et al. is at 100%, but with only 1 sub for 2006) best average score: grayehound most submissions: Gringz
4 days later
10 days later
3 days later
6 days later
Page:
1 2 3 (148 comments!) You must be logged in to leave a comment.
|
[after coming back from a weeks vacation i found it difficult to get back into the threadless-groove. as a result, i don't know if i'll be updating or making lists again. i thank those who have enjoyed reading my stuff. maybe someday i'll be back.]
i make lists and compile stats in an effort to satisfy my incessant curiousity with threadless. ♥'s threadless lists top 20 scores for hellogoodbye top 20 scores for wired top 20 scores for sunshine top 20 scores for threadless top 20 scores for blik top 20 scores for red cross top 20 scores for extra tasty artist stats top winning artists top winning artists of 2006 artists with one sub, one win other lists top 20 scores for 2006 top 20 scores for all designs bottom 20 scores for all prints graph of averages for all prints my shirts ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
i tired my best to arrange it without too much confusion. hopefully the method for sorting is clear enough...is it?