   
Just another reason to buy this excellent shirt.
So, about to buy "burn" and I'm feeling saucy.
Guess any band name, and the first one named that also shows up in my itunes wins the STPs. Let's make it quick, people. And vote on my slogans if you want to, too.
Yes. Report stuff. our school has wacky blockers, and this is the only proven way of getting stuff from one place to another.
Jackson Currie Mrs. Barlow English/ 2nd Hour 18 May 2007 Gregory Rodriguez It was in the quiet city of Fremont, California where a single voice was heard. A voice of reason, of innovation, of America’s future. This voice belonged to Gregory Rodriguez, who, at the age of 37, is now a frequent columnist for the LA Times. His writings have garnered much attention, come of which have been considered “The Best American Political Writing of 2003” and gave him the title of “Hispanic Business’s Influential Hispanic of 1999” (Los Angeles1). Rodriguez still lives in Fremont with his wife and his two daughters. The opinions of Mr. Rodriguez address the demographic of America, especially, the changes brought about by shifts of demographics. He writes in a variety of aspects within the topic. Some columns are exposés on the racist ideals of the south, where the stubbornness of the senseless is brought to Los Angeles’s attention, courtesy of Mr. Rodriguez (Definitions 1). On occasion, Rodriguez also writes about foreign issues, such as a new law in Beijing that makes poor customer service illegal (China’s 1). Still, most of his writings discuss the changes brought about in California by the influx of immigrants. In one of his persuasive pieces, Rodriguez comforts those worrying over immigrants, detailing how assimilation of cultures will result in a newly balances America (Why We 1). His opinions are clearly in favor of immigrants and he wishes to promote the acceptance of different cultures with his writings. Rodriguez then explains the importance of immigrants in towns that need the additional labor they provide (Town 1). He also touches upon the common conception that Latinos are involved in gang activity. Rodriguez points out many instances which has Latinos working to prevent gang violence in their area (Our Latino 1). One of his main objectives is to destroy negative stereotypes surrounding the Latino Population. Rodriguez relies on facts to promote his opinion of the topics he discusses. In some columns, he may only have a small percentage of commentary in relation to factual data (Definitions 2). This may be because Rodriguez feels he needs to inform readers about the topic rather than persuade his lack of commentary is a factor that actually benefits his purpose. He lets his readers draw their own conclusions concerning topics. This creates a sense of independent thought, which is ultimately more effective than persuasive writing. Some may construe this tactics as laziness, while, in reality, the omission of certain aspects can truly improve a column. Another tactic of Rodriguez’s is his usage of personal experiences throughout his columns. He mentions a first hand experience in gang violence, where he was singled out due to his ethnicity (Our Latino 2). This, along with many other examples, shows the reader how well-learned Rodriguez is on the topic of demographics, and his personal experiences create a purpose for his passion. The personal experiences connect the author to the work, which, in turn, connects the reader to the work. The experiences also add legitimacy to any possible skepticism some may have regarding the authenticity of Rodriguez’s works. A persistent theme of Rodriguez’s writings is the fact that he perpetually tries to promote the Latino agenda and equality. He cites injustices made against Latinos in multiple columns (Town 2, Why We 2). Perhaps he feels it is his duty to bring these crimes into the forefront of the news, since they are not as well publicized elsewhere. His bias is expected, when one takes into consideration his background. One can assume that these remarks of injustices are seeds planted in their minds by Rodriguez which will bloom into full-fledged acceptance of all races. A commentator on the opposite end of the spectrum, Ann Coulter, voices her opinion on the topic of immigration, citing that immigrants do not contribute to the income or property tax base and have higher birth rates which consume most of welfare and healthcare systems (Treason 1). While this may be slightly true, Rodriguez states that many factors prevent illegal immigrants from becoming participating citizens in American society. With promises of “Amnesty”, some immigrants are tricked into being deported by the INS agents (Town 2). Rodriguez maintains that there needs to be a mutual agreement between both parties involved in the immigration problem before any progress can be achieved. His unorthodox approah to writing sets Rodriguez apart from other columnists who are writing on the same issue. While some find him foolish and over-idealistic, Rodriguez holds his positions and compromises for no one. The tenacity is an inpiring representation of the American way. Rodriguez is writing to make a difference. And one day, through understanding, that change will be made.
IT WAS AMAZING.
You have to see it for yourself. It's precious. I'll give you a little taste of what's to come. Quentin Tarentino pulls down his pants and his genitalia melts off his body. It's horrendously graphic. Easily one of the coolest movie going experiences ever.
Wowie. Thanks for the warm reception on my new slogans. I'm really surpirsed on those scores. I guess I'm just a word wizard.
 Okay, okay. I get it. You shipped my order. Just settle down. Anyone else get molested by the shipping message robot?
You might have already seen this, but it is CLASSIC!
Start your gigglin'!
I'm about to buy an iMac, so I was wondering.
Should I buy it from apple.com's store, or go to my local Comp USA and buy it there? The pros of buying it online are that there will be no taxes on the computer, which will save about $80. EDIT: Looks like there actually is an estate tax of $90... The pros of buying it at CompUSA are convenience and a close location if I need repairs. What would you whiteys do in this situation?
So my friends and I entered a competition where this museum gives us certain criteria and we have to write, film, and edit a movie in 24 hours. This was the criteria.
Theme: Reservation Prop: Pipe Line of Dialogue: "Please, God, let me win." (has to be exact phrase) So, tell me what you tink of it. Oh, and it had to be 5 minutes or shorter, so, it may seem a bit rushed.
Anyone got any sweet pointers on how to ACE the ACT's? I'm taking them tomorrow morning.
|
                       Jackson Currie Mrs. Wilkerson English/ 4th Hour 19 November 2007 Act IV Questions No, she truly believes that Hamlet is mad and even confesses that Hamlet is guilty of the murder of Polonius. He cares more about himself than the well-being of Polonius or Hamlet. He calls Rosencrantz a sponge because he soaks up the king’s countenance, his rewards, his authorities, and Hamlet warns him that when the king needs what you have gleaned,he is squeezing Rosencrantz, and, like a sponge, he shall be dry again. That, despite his great class rank, the king, once he’s dead, can mean as little to the world as the food of a beggar. Claudius sends Hamlet off to England with Rosencrantz and Guildenstern to ensure he gets there, with a message that orders for Prince Hamlet to be put to death. X He feels that if he just eats and sleeps, he isn’t utilizing the full potential of humans, who have the ability of thought and reason. He proclaims that his thoughts will be bloody, but he does not act exactly upon this statement. Many of his promises to himself are rarely ever kept Guilt makes you so full of stupid suspicions that you give yourself away because you're trying so hard not to. Although it was her father who dies, Ophelia is probably singing mournfully about Hamlet. It’s a double blow because not only has her father been murdered, but he’s been murdered by the man that Ophelia loves. Gertrude tries to protect the Claudius when Laertes enters. She notes that the “danish dogs are on the wrong track”. She, along with everyone else, seems to be getting progressively undone, and this shows how feeble minded she can be. The significance of rosemary and pansies show that Ophelia wants him to remeber her in his thoughts. Hamlet has been captured by pirates, who have returned him to Denmark. The queen, his mother, is devoted to him and the public loves him. He wants to be the one to kill Hamlet. X If Laertes’s love for his father is true, then he should have adequate motivation to kill Hamlet. |
© 2009, a skinnyCorp LLC company. All designs copyright by owner.
Oct 01 '07 by
