Threadless

snacktivity
snacktivity aka Accomplished Menunaire is a 22.14 year old boy, has been a member since June 25, 2005, has scored 3,136 submissions, giving an average score of 2.46, helping 29 designs get printed.
Yes. Report stuff. our school has wacky blockers, and this is the only proven way of getting stuff from one place to another.

Jackson Currie
Mrs. Barlow
English/ 2nd Hour
18 May 2007
Gregory Rodriguez
It was in the quiet city of Fremont, California where a single voice was heard. A
voice of reason, of innovation, of America’s future. This voice belonged to Gregory
Rodriguez, who, at the age of 37, is now a frequent columnist for the LA Times. His
writings have garnered much attention, come of which have been considered “The Best
American Political Writing of 2003” and gave him the title of “Hispanic Business’s
Influential Hispanic of 1999” (Los Angeles1). Rodriguez still lives in Fremont with his
wife and his two daughters.
The opinions of Mr. Rodriguez address the demographic of America, especially,
the changes brought about by shifts of demographics. He writes in a variety of aspects
within the topic. Some columns are exposés on the racist ideals of the south, where the
stubbornness of the senseless is brought to Los Angeles’s attention, courtesy of Mr.
Rodriguez (Definitions 1). On occasion, Rodriguez also writes about foreign issues,
such as a new law in Beijing that makes poor customer service illegal (China’s 1). Still,
most of his writings discuss the changes brought about in California by the influx of
immigrants.
In one of his persuasive pieces, Rodriguez comforts those worrying over
immigrants, detailing how assimilation of cultures will result in a newly balances America
(Why We 1). His opinions are clearly in favor of immigrants and he wishes to promote
the acceptance of different cultures with his writings. Rodriguez then explains the
importance of immigrants in towns that need the additional labor they provide (Town 1).
He also touches upon the common conception that Latinos are involved in gang activity.
Rodriguez points out many instances which has Latinos working to prevent gang
violence in their area (Our Latino 1). One of his main objectives is to destroy negative
stereotypes surrounding the Latino Population.
Rodriguez relies on facts to promote his opinion of the topics he discusses. In
some columns, he may only have a small percentage of commentary in relation to
factual data (Definitions 2). This may be because Rodriguez feels he needs to inform
readers about the topic rather than persuade his lack of commentary is a factor that
actually benefits his purpose. He lets his readers draw their own conclusions
concerning topics. This creates a sense of independent thought, which is ultimately
more effective than persuasive writing. Some may construe this tactics as laziness,
while, in reality, the omission of certain aspects can truly improve a column.
Another tactic of Rodriguez’s is his usage of personal experiences throughout his
columns. He mentions a first hand experience in gang violence, where he was singled
out due to his ethnicity (Our Latino 2). This, along with many other examples, shows
the reader how well-learned Rodriguez is on the topic of demographics, and his
personal experiences create a purpose for his passion. The personal experiences
connect the author to the work, which, in turn, connects the reader to the work. The
experiences also add legitimacy to any possible skepticism some may have regarding
the authenticity of Rodriguez’s works.
A persistent theme of Rodriguez’s writings is the fact that he perpetually tries to
promote the Latino agenda and equality. He cites injustices made against Latinos in
multiple columns (Town 2, Why We 2). Perhaps he feels it is his duty to bring these
crimes into the forefront of the news, since they are not as well publicized elsewhere.
His bias is expected, when one takes into consideration his background. One can
assume that these remarks of injustices are seeds planted in their minds by Rodriguez
which will bloom into full-fledged acceptance of all races.
A commentator on the opposite end of the spectrum, Ann Coulter, voices her
opinion on the topic of immigration, citing that immigrants do not contribute to the
income or property tax base and have higher birth rates which consume most of welfare
and healthcare systems (Treason 1). While this may be slightly true, Rodriguez states
that many factors prevent illegal immigrants from becoming participating citizens in
American society. With promises of “Amnesty”, some immigrants are tricked into being
deported by the INS agents (Town 2). Rodriguez maintains that there needs to be a
mutual agreement between both parties involved in the immigration problem before any
progress can be achieved.
His unorthodox approah to writing sets Rodriguez apart from other columnists
who are writing on the same issue. While some find him foolish and over-idealistic,
Rodriguez holds his positions and compromises for no one. The tenacity is an inpiring
representation of the American way. Rodriguez is writing to make a difference. And one
day, through understanding, that change will be made.

PacificLight
PacificLight on May 23 '07 at 4:00am
FREMONT!!!
FRICKINAWESOME
   FRICKINAWESOME on May 23 '07 at 4:02am
Is this what flashes through your mind before a nueron meltdown?
FRICKINAWESOME
   FRICKINAWESOME on May 23 '07 at 4:03am
PS- I just like to follow PL's eye to whatewver blog it leads me to. It's so hypnotic............
PacificLight
PacificLight on May 23 '07 at 4:03am
PS: More credible than ann Coulter, but just as douchy on the topic of Hispanic hating, is Samuel P. Huntington (professional douche).
PacificLight
PacificLight on May 23 '07 at 4:04am
No, it's just that I grew up in Fremont, haha. I wasn't expecting to see it on threadless.
FRICKINAWESOME
   FRICKINAWESOME on May 23 '07 at 4:05am
Whatever you say, dreamy green alien eyeball *hypnotic continues*
PacificLight
PacificLight on May 23 '07 at 4:13am
I think the your pink flowers complement my green avatar. PS: I looooove that Rodeo Clown you sent me.
FRICKINAWESOME
   FRICKINAWESOME on May 23 '07 at 4:25am
the song, or the actual clown i wrapped up in a brown burlap sack and shipped to you last week?
You must be logged in to leave a comment.

My gallery photos


My designs


All about me

Who loves orange soda?
Jackson Currie
Mrs. Wilkerson
English/ 4th Hour
19 November 2007
Act IV Questions
No, she truly believes that Hamlet is mad and even confesses that Hamlet is guilty of the murder of Polonius.
He cares more about himself than the well-being of Polonius or Hamlet.
He calls Rosencrantz a sponge because he soaks up the king’s countenance, his rewards, his authorities, and Hamlet warns him that when the king needs what you have gleaned,he is squeezing Rosencrantz, and, like a sponge, he shall be dry again.
That, despite his great class rank, the king, once he’s dead, can mean as little to the world as the food of a beggar.
Claudius sends Hamlet off to England with Rosencrantz and Guildenstern to ensure he gets there, with a message that orders for Prince Hamlet to be put to death.
X
He feels that if he just eats and sleeps, he isn’t utilizing the full potential of humans, who have the ability of thought and reason.
He proclaims that his thoughts will be bloody, but he does not act exactly upon this statement. Many of his promises to himself are rarely ever kept
Guilt makes you so full of stupid suspicions that you give yourself away because you're trying so hard not to.
Although it was her father who dies, Ophelia is probably singing mournfully about Hamlet. It’s a double blow because not only has her father been murdered, but he’s been murdered by the man that Ophelia loves.
Gertrude tries to protect the Claudius when Laertes enters. She notes that the “danish dogs are on the wrong track”.
She, along with everyone else, seems to be getting progressively undone, and this shows how feeble minded she can be.
The significance of rosemary and pansies show that Ophelia wants him to remeber her in his thoughts.
Hamlet has been captured by pirates, who have returned him to Denmark.
The queen, his mother, is devoted to him and the public loves him.
He wants to be the one to kill Hamlet.
X
If Laertes’s love for his father is true, then he should have adequate motivation to kill Hamlet.