Threadless

v1 Edison idea, 1058 days ago, click to expand
v2 Edison idea, 1045 days ago, click to expand
v3 Edison idea, 1045 days ago, click to expand
v4 Edison idea, 1044 days ago, click to expand
v5 Edison idea, 1044 days ago, click to expand
v6 Edison idea, 1044 days ago, click to expand
v7 Edison idea, 1044 days ago, click to expand
v8 Edison idea, 998 days ago, click to expand
v9 Edison idea, 998 days ago, click to expand
v10 Edison idea, 997 days ago, click to expand
v11 Edison idea, 997 days ago, click to expand
v12 Edison idea, 996 days ago, click to expand
v13 Edison idea, current version








Work in progress by:
The Results
Submit This!
2
Needs Work
1
Dont Submit!
0
Versions...
Version 1 - 1058 days ago
Version 2 - 1045 days ago
Version 3 - 1045 days ago
Version 4 - 1044 days ago
Version 5 - 1044 days ago
Version 6 - 1044 days ago
Version 7 - 1044 days ago
Version 8 - 998 days ago
Version 9 - 998 days ago
Version 10 - 997 days ago
Version 11 - 997 days ago
Version 12 - 996 days ago
Version 13 - 994 days ago

donlope01
donlope01 on Sep 05 '09
Here is a new try with Edison old bulb.

Can you tell me what is your prefer version between this one and the former version?

Thanks!!
feili
feili on Sep 06 '09
I think it is better by adding names and dates, plus clothing top
donlope01
donlope01 on Sep 07 '09
@Insiddius, thank you for the idea and the comment.

@feili, my first versions used typography and I was advised not to put words on the design....I think it was a wise advice.



Any other advices on wether I should submit v12 or 13??
adremex
adremex on Sep 07 '09
i think the wire on the inside of the bulb looks wierd, mostly because its different from the wiring right above it



critique mine:

http://www.threadless.com/critique/51991/Geek_Love
Diggit_6
Diggit_6 on Sep 07 '09
haha, very clever, I like this one a lot. Would love to see this printed. Nothing to critique this one on really. Much better than the previous versions.



give me some feedback too if you get the chance

http://www.threadless.com/critique/52231
You must be logged in to leave a comment.